Thinking in Complexity about Learning and Education: A Programmatic View

Authors

  • Ton Jörg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8800

Abstract

In this contribution the focus is on sketching a programmatic view of thinking in complexity about learning and development. This kind of thinking goes beyond linear thinking. The new thinking in complexity about a dynamic complex reality may enable us to build a new science of learning and education, which does not take the nonlinear complex reality for granted but regards it as “real”: a science with a framework that does not exist yet. A new vision on learning is presented which takes the concept of interaction as a key concept, which may be linked with the notion of dynamic complexity. Thinking in complexity has its focus on “that which is interwoven”. Learning and development through interaction may thus be viewed as a way of co‐creating ourselves within a web of reciprocal relationships with the other. This co‐creation may be described as a complex of self‐generative, self‐sustaining processes of mutual “bootstrapping” with potentially nonlinear effects over time. Modelling learning this way, may show learning to be a potentially nonlinear phenomenon within a new reality as the domain of possibilities and potentialities of learning. The modelling of such learning as “bootstrapping,” and the concomitant effects on both partners in the interaction, shows these very possibilities and potentialities of learning in their humanly connected spaces of possibility. It demonstrates the very truth of Vygotsky’s adage that “it is through others that we develop into ourselves.” Based on his thoughts, we are able to develop a new view of the complex nonlinear reality of learning and education, with learners as potentially nonlinear human beings.

Author Biography

Ton Jörg

Ton Jörg has been involved in complex systems and complexity thinking since 1971 and has been an educational scientist at the University of Utrecht since 1982. He obtained a BSc in Physics and Mathematics from the University of Amsterdam in 1970, an M.A in Psychology from the same university in 1977, and completed his dissertation about the choice of physics as an examination subject in 1994. He has worked as an evaluation researcher in different national and international projects and is currently writing a book about “New Thinking in Complexity for the Social Sciences. A Trans‐Disciplinary Approach.” Website: http://www.ivlos.uu.nl/deorganisatie/wiewatwaar/medewerkers/jrg/7000main.html

Downloads

Published

2009-01-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles