A Virtual Standoff – Using Q Methodology to Analyze Virtual Reference

Authors

  • Aaron Shrimplin Miami University Libraries
  • Susan Hurst Miami University Libraries

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18438/B8630N

Abstract

Abstract

Objective - To develop an exploratory understanding of reference librarians’ perceptions of virtual reference.

Methods – Q methodology was used to uncover points of view about virtual reference. Thirty-four librarians sorted 28 statements covering a wide range of opinions about virtual reference. Factor analysis was used to analyze the Q-sorts and factor scores were calculated to aid the task of understanding and interpretation.

Results - The factor analysis revealed three attitudinal typologies: Technophiles, Traditionalists, and Pragmatists. Each factor represents a group of reference librarians who think similarly about virtual reference.

Conclusions - This type of analysis provides data on the actual range of feelings and attitudes about providing virtual reference services. The factor analysis demonstrates that there are still a variety of strongly held viewpoints concerning virtual reference. Convergence towards either acceptance or rejection does not appear to be forthcoming.
By using this type of analysis and the resulting data as a basis for decision making, administrators could staff services more efficiently and with the resulting better fit between librarians and their positions, possibly increase morale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aaron Shrimplin, Miami University Libraries

Information Services Electronic Information Services Associate Librarian

Susan Hurst, Miami University Libraries

Information Services Business Librarian Assistant Librarian

Downloads

Published

2007-12-07

How to Cite

Shrimplin, A., & Hurst, S. (2007). A Virtual Standoff – Using Q Methodology to Analyze Virtual Reference. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2(4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8630N

Issue

Section

Research Articles