A New Proposal for Measuring Marital Fertility in Historical Populations

Authors

  • Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte Departamento de Sociología, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Campus Arrosadía 31006 Pamplona (Spain)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25336/P6J300

Abstract

In this paper, a critical analysis is made of some of the indices used in numerous historical studies on the decline of fertility. More concretely, it is demonstrated how the Total Marital Fertility Rate (TMFR) and the Ig and I’g indices of marital fertility designed by Coale (1986) not only are not good indicators of a population’s level of marital fertility, but also in some cases (for example, when there is an important delay in female mean age at marriage) can even indicate an increase in marital fertility when in reality it is decreasing. Likewise, a new index for measuring marital fertility (known as the Navarre Index) is presented which takes into account women’s average age at marriage as well as their mortality rate during their reproductive period.

Downloads

Published

2001-12-31

Issue

Vol:28 No.1 (2001)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following copyright statement applies to content published in Volumes 1 - 45 of Canadian Studies in Population.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.


Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).